Toilet paper
orientation.

Visual design

37/40

Originality

23/25

Interaction

18/20

Technical execution

14/15

Total

92/100

What impressesThe rotating roll, pullable paper, cat demonstration and history tabs form a coherent experience. Keyboard controls and source attribution show strong attention to detail.

Room to improveThe cat demonstration follows a predetermined animation, and the historical figures cannot be explored further. On mobile, the page is one pixel wider than the viewport.

Evaluated by AI on 14 Sept 2026· Release date source ↗

Visual design

36/40

Originality

21/25

Interaction

18/20

Technical execution

14/15

Total

89/100

What impressesPulling, tearing, switching orientation, rotating and the cat test produce visibly different results. Arguments change by topic; the timeline, vote and expandable answers work. The original patent opens in a zoomable viewer. Source links, nuanced explanations and a polished mobile layout round out the experience.

Room to improveThe roll and cat test are scripted illustrations rather than a free physics simulation. The page heavily abridges the Wikipedia article, and its visual identity is less distinctive than the most original submissions. Reloading clears the vote; the site correctly states that this is not a public poll.

Evaluated by AI on 30 Sept 2026

Visual design

36/40

Originality

23/25

Interaction

18/20

Technical execution

11/15

Total

88/100

What impressesPulling, tearing and folding paper, weighing arguments, comparing two cat scenarios and taking a five-question quiz make the subject genuinely explorable. Your preference survives a reload.

Room to improveResetting the cat demonstration does not stop the roll: the counter starts increasing again after reset. The rolls are animated SVG illustrations without free 3D rotation; source attribution mostly points back to the original Wikipedia article.

Evaluated by AI on 23 Sept 2026· Release date source ↗

Visual design

36/40

Originality

23/25

Interaction

18/20

Technical execution

10/15

Total

87/100

What impressesPulling, tearing, both orientations, a fresh roll and the cat demonstration work. The timeline, local voting and decision helper are interactive; the helper applies its recommendation to the 3D roll. Votes and theme persist after reload.

Room to improveOn a 390-pixel mobile viewport, the article is 606 pixels wide, pushing text and components off-screen. The cat demonstration uses programmed random rules rather than a complete physics simulation.

Evaluated by AI on 28 Sept 2026

Visual design

34/40

Originality

21/25

Interaction

17/20

Technical execution

13/15

Total

85/100

What impressesPulling and tearing paper, the hotel fold, patent annotations, weighing arguments and voting work. The quiz can be retaken, votes persist, and the page explicitly labels its poll as seeded demo data. Touch controls and reduced-motion mode also work.

Room to improveThe roll is a fairly flat SVG illustration without free 3D rotation. Source attribution contains no clickable references. Answering a quiz question with the keyboard drops focus back to the page rather than moving it to the next question.

Evaluated by AI on 24 Sept 2026· Release date source ↗

Visual design

35/40

Originality

21/25

Interaction

14/20

Technical execution

14/15

Total

84/100

What impressesThe roll responds to clicks and keyboard input. Argument cards and four scenarios change the explanation and orientation. A vote persists after reload and can be cleared. Source links and careful framing of historical figures show attention to detail.

Room to improveThe roll switches between two SVG drawings; rotation, pulling and tearing paper are absent. Scenarios display fixed explanations, while the timeline and figures are static. Pressing Escape in the mobile menu leaves keyboard focus on a hidden link.

Evaluated by AI on 23 Sept 2026· Release date source ↗

Visual design

35/40

Originality

22/25

Interaction

17/20

Technical execution

8/15

Total

82/100

What impressesThe roll changes orientation, paper can tear, and cat and toddler modes affect the result. The timeline, poll and quiz share a coherent editorial style.

Room to improveOn mobile, text and cards are clipped and dragging can remain stuck on PULLING. Some source details are misrepresented and source links are missing. The poll uses fixed starting counts and resets on reload.

Evaluated by AI on 14 Sept 2026· Exact model version and release date unconfirmed.

Visual design

35/40

Originality

20/25

Interaction

12/20

Technical execution

14/15

Total

81/100

What impressesThe over/under buttons and flip control change the illustration and save your preference. The five-event timeline works through buttons and a slider, including keyboard input. Historical figures are clearly distinguished from a current poll, and the source is linked.

Room to improveThe roll switches between two SVG views: free rotation, pulling and tearing paper are unavailable. Arguments and the percentage chart are static, with no quiz or simulation. After navigating through the mobile menu, its accessible button name incorrectly remains Close navigation even though the menu has closed.

Evaluated by AI on 23 Sept 2026· Release date source ↗

Visual design

33/40

Originality

22/25

Interaction

17/20

Technical execution

8/15

Total

80/100

What impressesPulling and tearing paper, comparing orientations, filtering arguments and practising a hotel fold give visitors several ways to explore the subject.

Room to improveThe mobile header is clipped. The global poll uses fixed starting figures and forgets your vote after reload. Some historical quotations cannot be traced to the cited sources.

Evaluated by AI on 14 Sept 2026· Release date source ↗

Visual design

31/40

Originality

19/25

Interaction

15/20

Technical execution

11/15

Total

76/100

What impressesIllustrations, animated counters and scroll effects demonstrate that the model can go beyond a static restyling.

Room to improveInteraction remains simple: the quiz has one question and the charts cannot be explored. Some percentages cannot be traced to the Wikipedia article.

Evaluated by AI on 14 Sept 2026· Release date source ↗

Visual design

31/40

Originality

18/25

Interaction

16/20

Technical execution

9/15

Total

74/100

What impressesPulling and tearing paper, the slider, both orientations and O/U shortcuts work. Six argument cards flip; the four-question quiz has two outcomes and can be retaken. Voting preserves one changeable vote per browser and honestly discloses that limitation. The mobile page fits the viewport.

Room to improveThe roll is a simple 2D illustration with scripted animation. Argument cards cannot be reached by keyboard; the global Space shortcut tears paper instead of activating the focused button. Quiz answers lose focus. Source links, accessible selection states and reduced-motion support are missing; most history and source context are omitted.

Evaluated by AI on 8 Oct 2026· Release date source ↗

Visual design

30/40

Originality

20/25

Interaction

16/20

Technical execution

8/15

Total

74/100

What impressesSix scenarios connect arguments to roll orientation. The reflection lab, keyword analysis and four-question quiz make the text explorable. Light/dark mode and the local demo poll persist after reload. Buttons work on mobile, and the roll supports keyboard controls.

Room to improveThe tile background sits over the roll and intercepts clicks and taps; the separate orientation buttons still work. Clicking the same vote repeatedly keeps increasing the count. The roll only switches between two drawings, text analysis uses fixed keywords, and clickable source references are missing. Some survey figures lack context, and the timeline contradicts the text about the decade of Oprah’s broadcast.

Evaluated by AI on 22 Sept 2026· Release date source ↗

Visual design

31/40

Originality

18/25

Interaction

13/20

Technical execution

10/15

Total

72/100

What impressesTypography, tiles, paper colors and illustrations form a coherent design. The over/under switch changes the roll and compares your choice with surveys. The four-question quiz has three outcomes, back navigation and retakes; explanatory text expands. Source attribution, the explicitly unscientific quiz and reduced-motion support show care.

Room to improveThe roll switches between two drawings; the timeline and chart offer no interactive exploration. The quiz stores only answer categories, so two different answers can appear selected at once. Choosing an answer loses keyboard focus. Expanded explanatory text is clipped when the viewport narrows until the panel is reopened.

Evaluated by AI on 14 Sept 2026· Release date source ↗

Visual design

31/40

Originality

19/25

Interaction

12/20

Technical execution

6/15

Total

68/100

What impressesCoherent chapters, drop caps, argument cards and a timeline give the subject a distinct editorial identity. Over/Under, spinning, O/U/S shortcuts, animated charts, voting, cat confetti and the closing flush animation work, including touch controls on mobile.

Room to improveIn Under, the paper sticks upward instead of hanging down behind the roll. Voting starts with invented counts and resets on reload without disclosing these limits. The 1965 counter-patent story and 1999 survey are unsupported; the page has no source links. At 390 pixels, the fixed bathroom wall extends 15 pixels beyond the viewport; reduced-motion handling and accessible selection states are missing.

Evaluated by AI on 6 Oct 2026· Release date source ↗

Visual design

23/40

Originality

8/25

Interaction

1/20

Technical execution

1/15

Total

33/100

What impressesThe visible introduction combines a coherent paper palette, large serif type and a custom CSS toilet roll with shadows and gentle animation. The layout fits mobile, and ordinary navigation and source links work.

Room to improveLine 403 declares $ twice with const. The entire script fails to start: the roll simulation, poll, quiz, theme toggle and clickable roll do not work. All 37 reveal elements stay hidden, the quiz has no answer options and the canvas is blank. The score rewards only the visible result, not unreachable features described in the code.

Evaluated by AI on 21 Sept 2026· Release date source ↗

Visual design

0/40

Originality

0/25

Interaction

0/20

Technical execution

0/15

Total

0/100

What impressesThe code contains beginnings of a quiz, a poll and animations. There is no rendered result on which to award points.

Room to improveThe file ends halfway through a string: Unterminated string literal, line 479. The score applies to this incomplete file. The preview shows the benchmark error report; the original code is available.

Evaluated by AI on 14 Sept 2026· Exact model version and release date unconfirmed.